Playwright vs BugBug

Explore the easier testing alternative

Discover why startups are choosing BugBug for their automated testing needs. Stop wasting your time on complex tools. Scale without worrying about limits and unexpected costs.

Free forever
No credit card required
Playwright vs BugBug
Robbie Miller at PS WEbsite Design
“With BugBug, we have successfully reduced test building time by an impressive 100%, saving an average of 60 minutes per day. This time-saving benefit enables our team to focus on other critical tasks and enhances overall productivity.”
Robbie MillerMarketing Manager at PS Website Design
ps web design logo

At a Glance: BugBug vs Playwright

OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW section arrow

BugBugPlaywright

Price

checkedFree plan + Paid plans

checked100% Free (Open-source, Apache-2.0 license)

Ease of Use

checkedVery intuitive UI – no coding, no setup needed

warningRequires coding knowledge and setup

Test Creation

checkedVisual recorder with full control over steps

warningCode-based: JavaScript, Python, Java, .NET

Test Maintenance

checkedEasy to re-record or edit steps visually

warningRequires code updates, but offers trace viewer & debugging tools

Local Testing

checkedYes – run tests locally or in the cloud

checkedYes – run locally or in CI

Flexibility

warningLess flexible than code-based tools

checkedHighly flexible with scripting, network interception, multi-context flows

Supported Browsers

warningChromium-based only

checkedSupports multiple browsers

Mobile Testing

uncheckedNot supported

checkedSupports mobile web emulation (Chrome Android & Mobile Safari)

Collaboration

checkedUnlimited users in all plans for free

warningCollaboration via code repositories and dev workflows (Git, CI/CD)

Best For

Agile SaaS teams needing speed

Technical teams needing full control

Industry leaders automate tests with BugBug

polly.help logo
ps web design logo

Why should you choose BugBug over Playwright?

REASON #1

Truly no-code - accessible for everyone

Playwright is powerful but developer-focused, while BugBug is fully codeless—anyone on your team can build and maintain end-to-end tests with no coding required.

BugBug Test Recorder
REASON #2

Simple setup & runs locally in your browser

Playwright requires setup and coding, slowing onboarding. BugBug runs instantly through a Chrome extension—record, edit, and run tests in minutes with no setup or dependencies.

BugBug Test recorder
REASON #3

Generous free plan & transparent pricing

Playwright is free but costly to maintain. BugBug removes overhead with free-forever, flat pricing, and unlimited users—making QA far more cost-effective for startups and small teams.

BugBug Team invite feature
quote mark

BugBug has allowed us to implement automated tests in a number of areas of our product, saving time and effort for the QA team and allowing us to have a base set of tests that can be run at any time.

Josh BentSoftware Tester at Zahara Software

See what our customers are saying

da vinci studio
quote mark
BugBug is super intuitive and lowers the barrier of becoming an end-to-end tester. It reduces development time and significantly lowers the cost of software testing.
Wojciech, CEO at Davinci-Studio.com
quote mark
In two days we managed to automate test cases that took us weeks to write up and execute using other software. It is easy to use, yet can still perform advanced testing should the tester want to.
Panayiotis, Software Tester, ATM Marketing
calcey logo
quote mark
Very good and fast support from the BugBug team. Have clear documentation which really helps you to get started. Features like scheduling test cases and getting results are perfect for our needs.
Imalka, QA Engineer at Calcey.com

Spend less time fixing tests and more time releasing

BugBug is the better choice for teams that value simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and scalability.

Speed up your entire testing process

Test easier than ever with an intuitive test recorder.
Faster than coding. With unlimited test runs for free.